Moreover, the adoption of advanced technologies is hastening the arrival of intense societal disruptions in both countries. Even as artificial intelligence is contributing to an intensifying bilateral rivalry, it also is driving both countries to race out ahead of the rest of the world in innovation, economic growth, and overall national power. This paper argues that we need a different narrative to describe the role of AI in the escalating competition between the United States and China. Such framing has done more to conceal than clarify and, if taken to its logical end-point, will do more harm than good for the United States.ĪI will create both immense stress on the U.S.-China relationship as well as opportunities for potential collaboration. Public statements and national plans from both governments have reinforced this zero-sum dynamic. This has led to near-daily invocations of the Cold War to describe the intensifying rivalry between the United States and China, and to frequent analogies to an “arms race” to describe bilateral competition in advanced technologies, including quantum computing and artificial intelligence (AI). Under President Donald Trump, great power competition has become the organizing principle of American foreign policy. Thornton China Center, Foreign Policy, The Brookings Institution A recent government report revealed that cyber intrusions from China have compromised more than 40 Pentagon weapons programs and approximately 30 other defense technologies.Senior Research Assistant and Project Manager - John L. The defendants- Wang Dong, Sun Kailiang, Wen Xinyu, Huang Zhenyu, and Gu Chunhui- are officers in Unit 61398 of the Third Department of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA). According to a grand jury indictment, the hackers targeted leading manufacturers of solar and nuclear technology and stole internal communications, trade secrets, and confidential business information for competitive advantage. In May 2014, the Department of Justice announced that five Chinese military hackers had been charged with stealing trade secrets and accessing other sensitive or proprietary information online. Defendant organizations face fines of up to $10 million. Penalties upon conviction include fines of up to $500,000 per offense and imprisonment of up to 15 years for individuals. The EEA also criminalizes the act of receiving, purchasing, or possessing a trade secret that is known to have been stolen or misappropriated, or even conspiring to do so. The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 makes it a federal crime to steal or misappropriate a trade secret with the intention of benefiting a foreign government, instrumentality, or agent. Difference between New York State and Federal statutes Some charges can be defended as competitive intelligence gathering as opposed to theft. Mental disease / defect, false accusation, and proven lack of intent to knowingly commit an illegal act can all be presented as defenses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |